Comparative analysis of classical and modern theories of population migration
https://doi.org/10.28995/2782-2222-2023-4-10-23
Abstract
The article considers classical and modern theories of population migration developed by Western researchers, the study of which allows us to explain the emergence and development of migration processes. The contribution of Russian researchers to the study of certain aspects of migration is reflected. In the course of the study, general and particular characteristics of the considered theories are highlighted. It is shown that classical theories consider migration mainly from the point of view of an economic approach. In modern theories, migration is considered from the point of view of a systematic approach, which, on the one hand, allows considering it as the result of individual decisions, the adoption of which is influenced by certain structural factors, and, on the other hand, allows one to analyze migration in the context of global flows of capital and goods, the actions of global and regional economic, political, cultural and other factors.
About the Authors
M. A. Chavykina
Russian State University for the Humanities
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Mariya A. Chavykina, Cand. of Sci. (Economics)
bld. 6, Miusskaya Square, Moscow, 125047
S. V. Pakhomov
Russian State University for the Humanities
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Sergei V. Pakhomov, Cand. of Sci. (Economics)
bld. 6, Miusskaya Square, Moscow, 125047
References
1. Canales, A.I. (2019), Migration, Reproduction and Society, Brill, https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004409224.
2. DaVanzo, J.S. and Morrison, P.A. (1981), “Return and Other Sequences of Migration in the United States”, Demography, vol. 18 (1), pp. 85–101, https://doi.org/10.2307/2061051.
3. Faist, T. (2016), “Cross-border Migration and Social Inequalities”, Annual Review of Sociology, vol. 42, pp. 323–346, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurevsoc-081715-074302.
4. Hunter, L.M. and Simon, D.H. (2023), “Time to Mainstream the Environment into Migration Theory?”, International Migration Review, vol. 57 (1), pp. 5–35, https://doi.org/10.1177/01979183221074343.
5. Lee, Everett S. (1966), “A Theory of Migration”, Demography, vol. 3 (1), pp. 47–57, https://doi.org/10.2307/2060063.
6. Lewis, W.A. (1954), “Economic Development with Unlimited Supplies of Labour”, The Manchester School, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 139–191, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9957.1954.tb00021.x.
7. Massey, D.S., Arango, J., Graeme, H., Kouaouci, A., Pellegrino, A. and Taylor, J.E. (1993), “Theories of International Migration: A Review and Appraisal”, Population and Development Review, vol. 19 (3), pp. 431–466, https://doi.org/10.2307/2938462.
8. Piore, M. (1979), Birds of passage. Migrant labour and industrial societies, New York:Cambridge University Press, USA.
9. Rybakovskii, L.L. (2003), Migratsiya naseleniya. Tri stadii migratsionnogo protsessa, (Ocherki teorii i metodov issledovaniya) [Migration of the population. Three stages of the migration process. (Essays on theory and research methods)], Moscow, Russia.
10. Stark, O. and Bloom, D.E. (1985), “The new Economics of Labor Migration”, The American Economic Review, vol. 75 (2), pp. 173–178.
11. Van Hear, N., Bakewell, O. and Long, K. (2018), “Push-pull plus: Reconsidering the Drivers of Migration”, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, vol. 44 (6), pp. 927–944, https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2017.1384135.
12. Zenkina, E.V. (2023), “Capital in modern social reproduction. The evolution of understanding and managing it”, International Scientific Journal, no. 1 (88), pp. 52–59.
13. Zenkina, E.V., Sopilko, N.Yu. and Chavykina, M.A. (2023), “Security of the integration association. The role of human resources of the EAEU”, International Scientific Journal, no. 2 (89), pp. 33–47.
Review
For citations:
Chavykina M.A., Pakhomov S.V. Comparative analysis of classical and modern theories of population migration. Science and art of management. 2023;(4):10-23. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.28995/2782-2222-2023-4-10-23
Views:
185
Email this article 