Financial and economic aspects of technocratic utopia of A.K. Gastev
https://doi.org/10.28995/2782-2222-2023-1-54-66
Abstract
The article puts forward a hypothesis about the four fundamental foundations of the technocratic utopia of A.K. Gastev – new geography/urbanism, economics/fnancial capital, labor and culture. The greatest attention is paid to its economic foundations. The author analyzes the place and connections of the elements of A.K. Gastev’s utopia with the works of R. Hilferding, A.V. Chayanova, P.A. Kropotkin in a cultural and historical context.
About the Author
A. A. Gukovskaya
Russian State University for the Humanities
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Anastasiya A. Gukovskaya, Cand. of Sci. (Economics), associate professor
bld. 6, Miusskaya Square, Moscow, 125047
References
1. Bailes K.E. (1977), “Alexei Gastev and the Soviet controversy over Taylorism, 1918–24”, Soviet Studies, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 373–394.
2. Gastev, A.K. (1919), “On the tendencies of proletarian culture”, Proletarskaya kul’tura [Proletarian culture], no. 9–10.
3. Gastev, A.K. (1964), Poeziya rabochego udara [The Poetry of a Worker’s Strike], Sovetskii pisatel’, Moscow, USSR.
4. Gastev, A.K. (1973a), Trudovye ustanovki [Labor directives], Ekonomika, Moscow, USSR.
5. Gastev, Yu.A. (1973b), “From social engineering to cybernetics. On the methodological concept of the Central Institute of Labor”, Gastev, A.K. Trudovye ustanovki. Ekonomika, Moscow, USSR, pp. 5–22, Geller, L. and Nike, M. (2003), Utopiya v Rossii [Utopia in Russia], Giperion, Saint Petersburg, Russia.
6. Gil’ferding R. (1931), Finansovyi kapital. Noveishaya faza v razvitii kapitalizma [Financial capital. The latest phase in the development of capitalism], Gos. sotsial’no-ekonomich. izd-vo, Moscow, Leningrad, Russia.
7. Gyunter H. (2012), Po obe storony utopii: Konteksty tvorchestva A. Platonova [On Both Sides of Utopia. The Contexts of A. Platonov’s Works], Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, Moscow, Russia.
8. Johansson, K. (1983), Aleksej Gastev Proletarian Bard of the Machine Age”, Almqvist &Wikseil International.
9. Kropotkin, P.A. (1908), Polya, fabriki i masterskie (zemledelie, promyshlennost’ i remesla) [Fields, factories and workshops (agriculture, industry and crafts)], Tipo-litografya T-va I.N. Kushner i K, Moscow, Russia.
10. Lunacharskii, A.V. (1968), Vospominaniya i vpechatleniya [Memories and impressions], Moscow, USSR.
11. Makkloski, D. (2015), Ritorika ekonomicheskoi nauki [Rhetoric of economic science], Izd-vo In-ta Gaidara, Mezhdunar. otn., Fakul’tet svobodnykh iskusstv i nauk SPBGU, Moscow, Saint Petersburg, Russia.
12. Nikulin, A.M. (2020), Shkola Chayanova: utopiya i sel’skoe razvitie: monografya [Chayanov School. Utopia and Rural Development. Monograph], Delo, RANKHiGS, Moscow, Russia.
13. Paniotova, T.S. (2020), “The battle for the future at the crossroads of utopias”, The Bulletin of Moscow State University of Culture and Arts, no. 3 (95), pp. 6–20.
14. Pavlova, O.A. (2017), “The principle of ‘megamachine’ in the model of proletarian culture by A. Gastev”, Ekonomika. Pravo. Pechat’. Vestnik KSEI, no. 3 (75), pp. 55–64.
15. Pumpyanskii, L.M. (1922), “About industrial labor”, Ehkonomist. Vestnik XI otdela Russkogo tekhnicheskogo obshchestva [Economist. Bulletin of the 11th Department of the Russian Technical Society], no. 1, pp. 108–114.
16. Vel’minskii, V. (2010), “The Poetry of a Hammer Strike as a Means of ‘Imposing’ Invention”, Logos, no. 1 (74), pp. 173–192.
17. Williams R (1980), “Collective Immortality: The Syndicalist Origins of Proletarian
18. Culture, 1905–1910”, Slavic Review, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 389–402.
Review
For citations:
Gukovskaya A.A. Financial and economic aspects of technocratic utopia of A.K. Gastev. Science and art of management. 2023;(1):54-66. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.28995/2782-2222-2023-1-54-66
Views:
125
Email this article 