The digital divide and the approaches to its assessment. International dimension
https://doi.org/10.28995/2782-2222-2024-4-46-57
Abstract
The modern economy is characterized by is characterized by in creased role of the new technologies based on Industry 4.0 which significantly improve the efficiency of production. The rise in the level of informatisation, digitalisation of society and digital skills is essential for states in their internal policies, since in combination those factors are creating the digital environment that is necessary for the exploitation of more and more complex technologies and the creation of new ones, improving the country’s competitive position on the world stage. The purpose of the article is to study the existing approaches to the assessment of the digital divide, analyze and define a set of criteria for the economic analysis of the digital divide, which to the right extent reflects the economic aspect of such phenomenon for inter-country comparisons. The methodological basis of the research is based on the structural-functional method, which made it possible to identify the main elements defining the essence of the digital divide; historical and logical methods, which were used for analyzing the development of theories forming the conceptual basis for the digital divide. The conducted analysis in the development of theoretical concepts related to the information society, technological gap and digital divide leads to the conclusion that the current approaches to the assessment of the digital divide are based to a greater extent on the instruments of sociological research. The author suggests an approach to the analysis of the digital divide that combines indicators of the digital environment, digital economy and digital sovereignty and is based on the four groups of indicators: access to the Internet, the readiness of the population to use digital technologies effectively, the level of business digitalisation, digital potential.
About the Author
E. V. BogomazRussian Federation
Ekaterina V. Bogomaz, postgraduate student
bld. 7-9, Universitetskaya Embankment, Saint Petersburg, 199034
References
1. Aleksandrova, T.V. (2019), “Digital gap of the Russia regions. Causes, assessment, ways of overcoming”, Economics and Business: Theory and Practice, no. 8. pp. 9–12.
2. Attewell, P. (2001), “Comment: The First and Second Digital Divides”, Sociology of Education, vol. 74, no. 3, pp. 252–259.
3. Hargittai, E. (2001), “Second-level digital divide: mapping differences in people’s online skills”, First Monday, no. 7 (4), available at: https://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/942/864 (Accessed 7 August 2024).
4. Hilbert, M. (2014), “Technological information inequality as an incessantly moving target: The redistribution of information and communication capacities between 1986 and 2010”, Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, no. 4, pp. 821–835.
5. Norris, P. (2001), Digital Divide: Civic Engagement, Information Poverty and the Internet Worldwide, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, USA.
6. OECD (2001), “Understanding the Digital Divide”, no. 49, available at: https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/236405667766.pdf?expires=1718144210&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=CC57CCBA5CE6BF4C8FECDC0C65C3F529 (Accessed 4 Aug. 2024).
7. Pantserev, K.A. (2010), “Information society and its evolution in a historical perspective”, Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. International Relations, no. 1. pp. 65–72.
8. Posner, M.V. (1961), “International Trade and Technical Change”, Oxford Economic Paper, vol. 13, pp. 324–341.
9. Ragnedda, M. (2019), “Conceptualising the digital divide”, Mutsvairo, B. and Ragnedda, M. (eds.), Mapping the Digital Divide in Africa: A Mediated Analysis, Amsterdam University Press, pp. 27–44.
10. Sopilko, N.Yu., and Myasnikova, O.Yu. (2021), “The main trends of digital transformation in the economy of the EAEU countries”, Questions of the regional economy, no. 2 (47), pp. 207–213.
Review
For citations:
Bogomaz E.V. The digital divide and the approaches to its assessment. International dimension. Science and art of management. 2024;(4):46-57. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.28995/2782-2222-2024-4-46-57