Preview

Science and art of management

Advanced search

Features of the socio-cultural life of the population in mono-towns

https://doi.org/10.28995/2782-2222-2022-4-44-54

Abstract

The qualitative certainty of a mono-town, its distinctive and peculiar socio-economic environment, differs significantly from other cities and settlements, emphasizing the specific features of urban society inherent only to them.
The reasons for the appearance of mono-towns on the territory of Russia are different, for example, industrial mono-towns appeared during the development of the Urals and Siberia, and are related to the geographical features of the location and natural resources (minerals) of the territories, what was subsequently taken into account for the development of the national economy, but without regard to the social infrastructure and characteristics of the population of those territories.
The collapse of the USSR marked the beginning of a reduction in the number of mono-towns on the territory of Russia, dividing those territories into zones depending on their socio-economic situation: dynamically developing, with risks of deterioration and critical (complex). At the same time, the challenges of all single-industry mono-towns are the same – they are production, technological, and social issues. The continued existence and development of mono-towns comes to the fore, influencing the level of well-being and quality of life of the population.
The state’s policy in the field of cultural development and preservation of historical heritage, including mono-towns, is aimed, among other things, at strengthening civic identity, continuity of generations, strengthening traditions and customs, accessibility, as defined in Article 44 of the Constitution of Russia (paragraphs 1–3). It defines the accessibility of cultural values and goods, necessary knowledge in the field of education and information support.

About the Author

E. N. Pyatsheva
Russian State University for the Humanities
Russian Federation

Elena N. Pyatsheva, Сand. of Sci. (Economics)

bld. 6, Miusskaya Square, Moscow, 125047



References

1. Chernysh, M.F. and Markin,V.V. (eds.) (2020), Prostranstvennoe razvitie malykh gorodov: sotsial’nye strategii i praktiki [Spatial Development of Small Towns. Social Strategies and Practices], FNISTs RAN, Moscow, Russia.

2. Gabdulova, N.N. (2007), “Cultural space of a provincial town”, Trudy pskovskogo politekhnicheskogo instituta [Proceedings of the Pskov Polytechnic Institute], no. 11.1, pp. 40–43.

3. Healey, P. (2005), Collaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies, 2nd edn., Macmillan Press, London, UK, pp. 1–22.

4. Park, R.E. (1967), The city, University of Chicago, Chicago, London. Satybaldina, E.V. (2011), “The family of factory workers in the conditions of the average Ural city: A historical and sociological digression”, News of the Ural State University, Ser. 3, Social Sciences, no. 2 (91), pp. 65–77.

5. Shchegoleva, A.V. (2007), “The city as the space of culture interactions”, Vestnik of Lobachevsky State University of Nizhni Novgorod. Series: Social Sciences, no. 2 (7), pp. 203–206.

6. Veber, M. (1990), Izbrannye proizvedeniya [Selected works], Progress, Moscow, Russia.


Review

For citations:


Pyatsheva E.N. Features of the socio-cultural life of the population in mono-towns. Science and art of management. 2022;(4):44-54. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.28995/2782-2222-2022-4-44-54

Views: 151


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2782-2222 (Print)